4.7 Article

How to convert green supply chain integration efforts into green innovation: A perspective of knowledge-based view

Journal

SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Volume 28, Issue 5, Pages 1106-1121

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/sd.2062

Keywords

green innovation; green supply chain integration; knowledge creation; stakeholder engagement; sustainable development

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1702900]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71702148, 71732006]
  3. Social Science Planning Research Project in Shandong Province [19CGLJ03]
  4. Soft Science Research Project in Shaanxi Province [2019KRM142]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Although the importance of green supply chain integration (GSCI) in facilitating green innovation has been recognized, most existing literature constructs a direct link for the GSCI-green innovation relationship. How firms convert their GSCI efforts into green innovation is still unclear. By collapsing GSCI into three dimensions (i.e., green supplier integration, green internal integration, and green customer integration), this study explores an indirect GSCI-green innovation link in which knowledge exchange and knowledge combination are deemed as mediators. We employ survey data from 237 Chinese manufacturers and structural equation modeling techniques to test research hypotheses. Our findings support the major argument that the impact of GSCI on green innovation is indirect. Specifically, green internal integration impacts green product and process innovation via both knowledge exchange and knowledge combination; while green supplier integration affects green product and process innovation indirectly only via knowledge combination and green customers integration affects green product and process innovation indirectly only via knowledge exchange. This study advances our understanding on the GSCI-green innovation relationship.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available