4.7 Article

Electrical resistivity and Mossbauer studies of Cr substituted Co nano ferrites

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 694, Issue -, Pages 366-374

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.10.028

Keywords

Nanostructures; Chemical synthesis; Electrical properties; Electrical resistivity; Activation energy

Funding

  1. UGC, New Delhi

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nano structured CoCrxFe2-xO4 Ferrites with x = 0, 0.1, 0.3, 0.5, 0.7, 0.9 and 1.0 were prepared through Citrate-gel chemical synthesis. DC electrical resistivity (rho) of the prepared samples was measured in the temperature range of 200-700 degrees C using two probe method and room temperature Mossbauer measurements were studied. A decreasing trend rho with an increase in temperature was observed ensuring the semiconducting nature of the ferrites under test. From the Arrhenius plots (log rho vs 1000/T), corresponding activation energies for conduction of all the compositions were obtained that show a straight line with two slopes. With an increase in Cr composition, resistivity (rho) of the ferrite samples was found to increase from 1.4 x 10(6) Omega-cm to 46.2 x 10(3) Omega-cm at 300 K. Drift mobility was found to increase with increasing temperature due to a decrease in DC electrical resistivity. Curie temperature (T-C) was decreased from 740 K to 641 K and the Activation energy of hopping (Delta E) was increased from 0.075 to 0.222 ev with an increase in Cr composition. This suggests that conduction process in the present Co-Cr nano ferrite system is due to hopping of polarons. The results indicate that the activation energy in the paramagnetic region is higher than that in the ferrimagnetic region. The presence of a paramagnetic doublet in Mossbauer spectra of the samples was attributed to the presence of very small sized nano particles in the superparamagnetic regime. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available