4.7 Article

Sea urchin-like core/shell hierarchical porous carbon for supercapacitors

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 719, Issue -, Pages 438-445

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.05.229

Keywords

Sea urchin-like; Core-shell; Activated; Hierarchical porous; Supercapacitors

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21676070]
  2. Hebei Natural Science Foundation [B2015208109]
  3. Hebei Training Program for Talent Project [A201500117]
  4. Beijing National Laboratory for Molecular Sciences [20140120]
  5. Five Platform Open Fund Projects of Hebei University of Science and Technology [2015PT37]
  6. Hebei One Hundred-Excellent Innovative Talent Program(III) [SLRC2017034]
  7. Hebei Science and Technology Project [17214304D]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We report a strategy to prepare sea urchin-like core-shell carbon spheres (SUCSs) by one-pot cooperative assembly process. The obtained SUCSs have sea urchin-like core with pores radially oriented from the center to the outer surface. By adjusting the amount of tetraethyl orthosilicate and resorcinol formaldehyde resins, the SUCSs with different diameters and shell thicknesses are obtained. After activated by KOH, the SUCSs with hierarchical pores are explored as electrode materials for supercapacitors. Due to hierarchical pores and sea urchin-like core-shell structure, the activated SUCSs show a reversible specific capacitance as high as 230 F g(-1) at a current density of 0.5 A g(-1). And the activated SUCSs also exhibit good electrochemical stability (95.02% of its initial capacity) at a current density of 2 A g(-1) for up to 10000 cycles in 6 M KOH aqueous solution. These results reveal that the sea urchin-like core-shell carbon spheres with hierarchical pores are promising candidates for supercapacitor applications. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available