4.7 Article

Ti-doped Fe1-xTixF3.0.33H2O/C nanocomposite as an ultrahigh rate capability cathode materials of lithium ion batteries

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 702, Issue -, Pages 372-380

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.01.240

Keywords

Lithium ion batteries; Ti-doping; Iron fluoride; Cathode material; Electrochemical performance

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51472211, 21573187]
  2. Key Project of Strategic New Industry of Hunan Province [2016GK4005, 2016GK4030]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The conductivity problem of FeF3.0.33H(2)O is the main constraint on development and application of this next-generation cathode material for lithium/sodium ion batteries. It has been found in our previous theoretical calculation that Ti-doping can dramatically improve the conductivity FeF3.0.33H(2)O, and thus improving its electrochemical performance. Herein, Ti-dopedFe(1-x)Ti(x)F(3).0.33H(2)O (x = 0, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10) compounds have been successfully synthesized via a liquid-phase method. Subsequently, a ball milling process with acetylene black (AB) has been used to form Fe1-xTixF3.0.33H(2)O (x = 0, 0.06, 0.08, 0.10) nanocomposite. The chemical composition and elemental distribution of the Ti-doped Fe1-xTixF3.0.33H(2)O samples were investigated by X-ray diffraction (XRD) and energy-dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX5). The results show that Ti can effectively dope into the samples, and replace partially Fe3+ ions in the FeF3.0.33H(2)Ocrystal. Especially the FeF3.0.33H(2)O/C nanocomposite achieves an initial capacity of 460.15 mAh g(-1) and retains a discharge capacity of 294.86 mAh g(-1) after 40 cycles in the voltage range of 1.5-4.5 V. Besides, the as-prepared material shows excellent rate capability, it can deliver a discharge capacity of 146.06 mAh g(-1) even at 2 degrees C. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available