4.6 Article

The CatWISE Preliminary Catalog: Motions from WISE and NEOWISE Data

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 247, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab7f2a

Keywords

Catalogs; Sky surveys; Proper motions; Brown dwarfs; Infrared astronomy

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)
  2. NASA's Astrophysics Data Analysis Program (ADAP)
  3. ADAP grant at Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory [NNH17AE75I]
  4. Fellowships and Internships in Extremely Large Data Sets (FIELDS) program - NASA at UC Riverside
  5. NASA Postdoctoral Program at the Jet Propulsion Laboratory

Ask authors/readers for more resources

CatWISE is a program to catalog sources selected from combined WISE and NEOWISE all-sky survey data at 3.4 and 4.6 mu m (W1 and W2). The CatWISE Preliminary Catalog consists of 900,849,014 sources measured in data collected from 2010 to 2016. This data set represents four times as many exposures and spans over 10 times as large a time baseline as that used for the AllWISE Catalog. CatWISE adapts AllWISE software to measure the sources in coadded images created from six-month subsets of these data, each representing one coverage of the inertial sky, or epoch. The catalog includes the measured motion of sources in eight epochs over the 6.5 yr span of the data. From comparison to Spitzer, signal-to-noise ratio = 5 limits in magnitudes in the Vega system are W1 = 17.67 and W2 = 16.47, compared to W1 = 16.96 and W2 = 16.02 for AllWISE. From comparison to Gaia, CatWISE positions have typical accuracies of 50 mas for stars at W1 = 10 mag and 275 mas for stars at W1 = 15.5 mag. Proper motions have typical accuracies of 10 mas yr(-1) and 30 mas yr(-1) for stars with these brightnesses, an order of magnitude better than from AllWISE. The catalog is available in the WISE/NEOWISE Enhanced and Contributed Products area of the NASA/IPAC Infrared Science Archive.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available