4.6 Article

Controlling the C2+product selectivity of electrochemical CO2 reduction on an electrosprayed Cu catalyst

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 13, Pages 6210-6218

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta13173f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Science and Technology (KIST) Institutional Program
  2. YU-KIST Convergence Program
  3. Next Generation Carbon Upcycling Project through the National Research Foundation (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [2017M1A2A2046713]
  4. National Research Foundation of Korea [2E30300, 2017M1A2A2046713] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cu catalysts prepared by modifying bulk Cu foils have achieved high performance for value-added C2+ compounds from electrochemical CO2 reduction (CO2RR) but the transformation of active sites can be affected by the bulk substrate, which make it complex to design the catalyst. Herein, we newly introduce a simple electrospray pyrolysis method to take advantage of a facile wet-chemical synthesis applicable on non-copper substrates, such as a porous carbon paper, and demonstrate highly enhanced selectivity for C2H4 production from CO2RR. The electrosprayed copper oxide on the carbon paper showed uniquely improved C2 selectivity compared with that on the copper substrate. The improved performance is proposed to be related to the presence of Cu mixed state and retention of morphology of the electrosprayed catalyst on the carbon paper, showing the importance of the substrate. In addition, the C2 product selectivity can be tuned by the electrospray synthesis time as it affects the size of the surface nanostructure as well as the porosity of the catalyst, which can provide an effective way to regulate the C2/C1 ratio.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available