4.7 Article

Effect of oxygen pressure on pulsed laser deposited WO3 thin films for photoelectrochemical water splitting

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 722, Issue -, Pages 913-919

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.108

Keywords

WO3 thin films; Pulsed laser deposition; Oxygen pressure; Photoelectrochemical water splitting; Hydrogen evolution rate

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [11504242]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2015M572356]
  3. Hong Kong, Macao and Taiwan Science AMP
  4. Technology Cooperation Program of China [2015DFH10200]
  5. Science and Technology Research Items of Shenzhen [JCYJ20160422102802301, KQJSCX2016022619562452]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tungsten oxide (WO3) thin films on fluorine-doped tin oxide (FTO) coated glass substrates are fabricated by pulsed laser deposition for photoelectrochemical water splitting. The effects of oxygen pressure during deposition on the structure, morphology, optical properties and photoelectrochemical performance of the films have been systematically evaluated. Columnar growth characteristic ofWO(3) thin films is observed at oxygen pressure higher than 8 Pa. The grain size increases with increasing oxygen pressure in the range of 1-13 Pa then decreases with further increasing oxygen pressure from 13 Pa to 30 Pa. Pure monoclinic phase of WO3 has been obtained for samples deposited above 13 Pa. Decreasing oxygen pressure below 8 Pa leads to an oxygen deficient surface with a substoichiometric phase. The film prepared at 13 Pa exhibits the best photoelectrochemical performance with a photocurrent density as high as 1.9 mA/cm(2) under a xenon lamp illumination in 0.1 M Na2SO4 electrolyte. Furthermore, hydrogen evolution conducted with a three-electrode configuration and a two-electrode configuration is presented and discussed. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available