4.6 Article

Impacts of land conversion and management measures on net primary productivity in semi-arid grassland

Journal

ECOSYSTEM HEALTH AND SUSTAINABILITY
Volume 6, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/20964129.2020.1749010

Keywords

Grassland degradation; land use and land cover change; management measures and policies; net primary productivity (NPP); Xilingol grassland; anthropogenic; human activities affects

Funding

  1. State Key Research Development Program of China [2016YFC0501101, 2016YFC0503603]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecological restoration measures implemented in China have profoundly impacted vegetation NPP. This study aimed to estimate the effects of the land conversion and management measures on the grassland ecosystem in semi-arid regions. Land use data were employed from 2000 to 2015 to compare land conversion and coverage changes in Xilingol grassland. Then, the contributions of land conversion and management policies were quantified by assessing the difference between actual NPP and climate-induced NPP changes. The results indicated that the grassland area had a net loss of 534.42 km(2), and the net area of increased vegetation coverage was 74,683.05 km(2). Furthermore, the total NPP increased by 8,010.73 Gg C center dot yr(-1) (1 Gg = 10(9) g), of which the human activities, including grazing management measures (+6,809.40 Gg C center dot yr(-1)) and land conversion (45.72 Gg C center dot yr(-1)) contributed to 85.58% of the increase in NPP. Transformation from desert and farmland dominated grassland expansion and NPP increase, while urbanization and desertification caused large grassland reduction and NPP loss. The grazing management increased vegetation NPP in most regions except for some regions in the desert steppe and the farming-pastoral zone. Related policies should be further adjusted to strengthen the management of the desert steppe and farming-pastoral regions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available