4.6 Article

An enhancement to sea ice motion and age products at the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC)

Journal

CRYOSPHERE
Volume 14, Issue 5, Pages 1519-1536

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/tc-14-1519-2020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NASA Cryospheric Sciences Program [NNX16AQ41G]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A new version of sea ice motion and age products includes several significant upgrades in processing, corrects known issues with the previous version, and updates the time series through 2018, with regular updates planned for the future. First, we provide a history of these NASA products distributed at the National Snow and Ice Data Center. Then we discuss the improvements to the algorithms, provide validation results for the new (Version 4) and older versions, and intercompare the two. While Version 4 algorithm changes were significant, the impact on the products is relatively minor, particularly for more recent years. The changes in Version 4 reduce motion biases by similar to 0.01 to 0.02 cm s(-1) and error standard deviations by similar to 0.3 cm s(-1). Overall, ice speed increased in Version 4 over Version 3 by 0.5 to 2.0 cm s(-1) over most of the time series. Version 4 shows a higher positive trend for the Arctic of 0.21 cm s(-1) per decade compared to 0.13 cm s(-1) per decade for Version 3. The new version of ice age estimates indicates more older ice than Version 3, especially earlier in the record, but similar trends toward less multiyear ice. Changes in sea ice motion and age derived from the product show a significant shift in the Arctic ice cover, from a pack with a high concentration of older ice to a sea ice cover dominated by first-year ice, which is more susceptible to summer melt. We also observe an increase in the speed of the ice over the time series >= 30 years, which has been shown in other studies and is anticipated with the annual decrease in sea ice extent.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available