4.7 Article

The Evolution of the Inner Regions of Protoplanetary Disks

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 893, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab7ead

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. PAPIIT-UNAM [IA102319, IN101418]
  2. CONACyT [23861]
  3. NASA [NNX17AE57G]
  4. FONDECYT-CONICYT [3190859]
  5. ICM (Iniciativa Cientifica Milenio) via the Nucleo Milenio de Formacion Planetaria grant

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We present a study of the evolution of the inner few astronomical units of protoplanetary disks around low-mass stars. We consider nearby stellar groups with ages spanning from 1 to 11 Myr, distributed into four age bins. Combining PANSTARSS photometry with spectral types, we derive the reddening consistently for each star, which we use (1) to measure the excess emission above the photosphere with a new indicator of IR excess and (2) to estimate the mass accretion rate from the equivalent width of the H alpha line. Using the observed decay of as a constraint to fix the initial conditions and the viscosity parameter of viscous evolutionary models, we use approximate Bayesian modeling to infer the dust properties that produce the observed decrease of the IR excess with age, in the range between 4.5 and 24 mu m. We calculate an extensive grid of irradiated disk models with a two-layered wall to emulate a curved dust inner edge and obtain the vertical structure consistent with the surface density predicted by viscous evolution. We find that the median dust depletion in the disk upper layers is at 1.5 Myr, consistent with previous studies, and it decreases to by 7.5 Myr. We include photoevaporation in a simple model of the disk evolution and find that a photoevaporative wind mass-loss rate of agrees with the decrease of the disk fraction with age reasonably well. The models show the inward evolution of the H2O and CO snowlines.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available