4.7 Article

Facile synthesis of sheet-like Fe/C nanocomposites by a combustion-based method

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 695, Issue -, Pages 1870-1877

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2016.11.021

Keywords

Sheet-like; Fe/C nanocomposites; Iron nanoparticles; Solution combustion synthesis

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation Program of China [51574031, 51574029]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Program of Beijing [2162027]
  3. National 863 Program [2013AA031101]
  4. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities [06109063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Sheet-like Fe/C nanocomposites have been successfully synthesized by a facile combustion-based method with two simple steps. First, a sheet-like precursor consisting of evenly mixed amorphous iron oxide and carbon was prepared through solution combustion synthesis by using ferric nitrate as an iron source and an oxidizer, glycine as a fuel and glucose as a carbon source. Subsequently, sheet-like Fe/C nanocomposites were synthesized via hydrogen reduction of the as-prepared precursor at 400 degrees C. The obtained Fe/C nanocomposites are composed of iron nanoparticles and amorphous carbon and the iron nanoparticles are homogenously embedded into the sheet-like carbon support. With the reduction time increasing from 2 h to 4 h, the saturation magnetization of the Fe/C nanocomposites reduced at 400 degrees C increases from 145.7 emu/g to 188.4 emu/g, whereas the coercivity decreases from 428.1 Oe to 90.4 Oe. The Fe/C nanocomposites reduced at 400 degrees C for 2 h have homogenous nanocomposite structure, well-dispersed iron nanoparticles with the size of similar to 20 nm and high specific surface area of 274.9 m(2)/g, which make this low-cost material a highly promising candidate for potential applications in water treatment, environmental remediation, absorption and catalysis. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available