4.7 Article

The influence of femtosecond laser repetition rates and pulse numbers on the formation of micro/nano structures on stainless steel

Journal

JOURNAL OF ALLOYS AND COMPOUNDS
Volume 722, Issue -, Pages 235-241

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE SA
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2017.06.080

Keywords

Micro/nano structure; Femtosecond laser; Anti-reflection; Stainless steel; ESEM

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M592709]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51535003, 61675186, 61505170]
  3. Sichuan Postdoctoral Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Micro/nano structures on stainless steel were prepared by femtosecond laser pulses (800 nm, 35 fs) with different repetition rates and pulse numbers in air. Environmental scanning electron microscopy and energy dispersive spectroscopy (ESEM/EDS) were used to study the detailed morphology, microstructure and composition. Femtosecond laser ablation areas were measured and compared. Ablation thresholds were calculated. Results showed that the laser-induced microstructure consists of two distinct regions: a core region of moth-eye-like structure and a peripheral region of micro/nano periodic structures surrounding the core. Nano particles were observed on those micro/nano structures. The dimension of moth-eye-like structure increased dramatically with increasing pulse numbers due to the incubation effect; and the amorphization of micro/nano structures became more serious with the increasing repetition rates. EDS results indicated that the atomic ratio of Cr increased slightly after laser irradiation. The laser induced damage threshold (LIDT) decreased with increasing pulse numbers. The reflectivity of stainless steel decreased for 25 times after laser irradiation. The formation of micro/nano structures can be explained by the plasma resonance absorption model. (C) 2017 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available