3.8 Article

Numerical simulation of transpiration cooling experiments in supersonic flow using OpenFOAM

Journal

CEAS SPACE JOURNAL
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 247-265

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s12567-019-00292-6

Keywords

Transpiration cooling; Supersonic flow; Compressible RANS; Numerical domain coupling; Ceramic matrix composites; Porous interface

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Transpiration cooling applied to modern ceramic matrix composite materials is an interesting concept for thermal protection of future aerospace applications. Therefore, reliable and accurate numerical tools for the simulation of transpiration cooling processes in complex flow situations and for complex porous geometries are needed. In this study, we present a fully coupled OpenFOAM solver and discuss the choice of suitable interface conditions as well as the coupling of numerical domains at the transpired surface. Additionally, a modified turbulence boundary condition for transpiration through low-porosity materials is proposed. The numerical solver is then applied to validation test cases with a flat and a double-wedge porous sample under blowing ratios up to FAir=0.75%The corresponding experiments with Carbon/Carbon samples were performed at the ITLR Hot Gas Facility at supersonic steady-state conditions, i.e. Ma=2.5and Tt=500K The simulation results are in good overall agreement with the experimental data for both test cases while capturing the influences of blowing ratio, as well as variations of the external flow field and in the heat flux distribution. Temperature predictions for the sample surface, within the porous wall, and in the downstream wake region show a good conformity to measurements, whereas deviations are observed in the direct wake. Based on the complementary insights provided by the numerical results, aspects such as the coolant through-flow behaviour as well as the sample's internal temperature distribution and heat conduction are analysed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available