4.7 Article

2-Phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-Oxide (PTIO•) Radical Scavenging: A New and Simple Antioxidant Assay In Vitro

Journal

JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL AND FOOD CHEMISTRY
Volume 65, Issue 30, Pages 6288-6297

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jafc.7b02247

Keywords

antioxidant assay; PTIO center dot scavenging; oxygen-centered radical; analytical method; 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-l-oxyl 3-oxide; H+ transfer

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81573558]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Current in vitro antioxidant assays have several limitations, which frequently cause inconsistent results. The study develops a new antioxidant assay using the 2-phenyl-4,4,5,5-tetramethylimidazoline-1-oxyl 3-oxide radical (PTIO center dot). After the investigation of various factors, the experimental protocol was briefly recommended as follows: PTIO center dot and the sample solution were added to phosphate buffer (pH 7.4, 50 mM), incubated at 37 degrees C for 2 h, and then spectrophotometrically measured at 557 nm. The validation test based on 20 pure compounds and 30 lyophilized aqueous extracts suggested that PTIO center dot scavenging had a good linear relationship, stability, and reproducibility. In the ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with electrospray ionization quadrupole time-of-flight tandem mass spectrometry analysis, PTIO center dot was observed to give m/z 234 when encountering L-ascorbic acid. As an antioxidant assay, PTIO center dot scavenging possesses four advantages, i.e., oxygen-centered radical, physiological aqueous solution, simple and direct measurement, and less interference from the tested sample. It can also satisfactorily analyze the antioxidant structure-activity relationship. PTIO center dot scavenging has no stereospecificity and is at least involved in H+ transfer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available