4.7 Article

Drivers and barriers for the adoption of use-oriented product-service A with consumers in medium and small cities

Journal

SUSTAINABLE PRODUCTION AND CONSUMPTION
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 92-103

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.spc.2019.11.002

Keywords

Use-oriented product-service system; Drivers for use-oriented PSS; Barriers for use-oriented PSS; Consumer behavior

Funding

  1. Research Coordination of the Brazilian Ministry of Education (CAPES), Brazil
  2. University of Passo Fundo Foundation (FUPF), Brazil

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considering that one of the alternatives for transitioning to a circular economy is the adoption of new business models based on use/performance instead of product ownership, we focused this study on the adoption of product-service systems (PSS). Specifically, we identify the main drivers and barriers affecting the adoption of use-oriented PSS by young consumers residing in medium and small cities. We opted to perform a descriptive research with a quantitative approach. We verified that environmental concern'' and healthy lifestyle'' are the main drivers for the adoption of use-oriented PSS, while unavailability of use-oriented PSS in the region or city'' presented the greatest barrier to the adoption. Furthermore, we conclude that drivers associated with hedonistic/experiential needs (such as self-fulfillment, self-esteem, sense of belonging), as well as personal factors (such as age and lifestyle) tend to positively incentivize the adoption of use-oriented PSS. Notwithstanding, situational factors'', as PSS availability and information about costs and usage methods can serve as inhibitors. Finally, to assist managers and academics, we propose a framework that summarizes the identified PSS adoption drivers and barriers along with recommendations to optimize adoption drivers. (C) 2019 Institution of Chemical Engineers. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available