4.2 Article

Anti-oxidative and anti-adipogenic effects of caffeine in an in vitro model of Graves' orbitopathy

Journal

ENDOCRINE JOURNAL
Volume 67, Issue 4, Pages 439-447

Publisher

JAPAN ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1507/endocrj.EJ19-0521

Keywords

Graves' orbitopathy; Thyroid eye disease; Oxidative stress; Adipogenesis; Caffeine

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) - Ministry of Science and ICT [NRF-2017R1A2B4009565]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Oxidative stress and adipogenesis play key roles in the pathogenesis of Graves' orbitopathy (GO). In this study, the therapeutic effects of caffeine on the reduction of oxidative stress and adipogenesis were evaluated in primary cultured GO orbital fibroblasts in vitro. Orbital fibroblasts were cultured from orbital connective tissues obtained from individuals with GO. Intracellular reactive oxygen species (ROS) levels induced by hydrogen peroxide or cigarette smoke extract and the expression of anti-oxidative enzymes were measured after caffeine treatment. After adipogenic differentiation and caffeine treatment, cells were stained with Oil Red O and the levels of peroxisome proliferator activator gamma (PPAR gamma), C/EBP alpha, and C/EBP beta were determined by western blot analysis. Hydrogen peroxide and cigarette smoke extract increased the levels of intracellular ROS and anti-oxidative enzymes, which decreased in a dose-dependent manner upon pretreatment with caffeine in GO orbital fibroblasts. Oil Red-O staining results revealed a decrease in lipid droplets; furthermore, PPAR gamma, C/EBP alpha, and C/EBP beta protein expression levels were inhibited upon treatment with caffeine during adipocyte differentiation. In conclusion, caffeine decreased oxidative stress and adipogenesis in GO orbital fibroblasts in vitro. These findings may contribute to the development of new types of caffeine-containing pharmacological agents for use in the management of GO.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available