4.7 Review

Restoring function in major depressive disorder: A systematic review

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 215, Issue -, Pages 299-313

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.02.029

Keywords

Major Depressive Disorder; Functional Impairment; Quality of Life; Functional Remission; Social Impairment; Work Performance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Functional impairment contributes to significant disability and economic burden in major depressive disorder (MDD). Treatment response is measured by improvement in depressive symptoms, but functional improvement often lags behind symptomatic improvement. Residual deficits are associated with relapse of depressive symptoms. Methods: A literature search was conducted using the following terms: major depressive disorder, functional impairment, functional outcomes, recovery of function, treatment outcome, outcome assessment, social functioning, presenteeism, absenteeism, psychiatric status rating scales, and quality of life. Search limits included publication date (January 1, 1995 to August 31, 2016), English language, and human clinical trials. Controlled, acute-phase, nonrecurrent MDD treatment studies in adults were included if a functional outcome was measured at baseline and endpoint. Results: The qualitative analysis included 35 controlled studies. The Sheehan Disability Scale was the most commonly used functional assessment. Antidepressant treatments significantly improved functional outcomes. Early treatment response predicted functional improvement, while baseline disease severity did not. Limitations: Clinical studies utilized various methodologies and assessments for functional impairment, and were not standardized or adequately powered. Conclusions: The lack of synchronicity between symptomatic and functional improvement highlights an unmet need for MDD. Treatment guided by routine monitoring of symptoms and functionality may minimize residual functional impairments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available