4.2 Article

Condom Catheters versus Indwelling Urethral Catheters in Men: A Prospective, Observational Study

Journal

JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL MEDICINE
Volume 15, Issue 4, Pages E1-E4

Publisher

JOHN WILEY & SONS INC
DOI: 10.12788/jhm.3180

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Department of Veterans Affairs, Health Services Research & Development Service [IIR 12-395, RCS 11-222]
  2. Center for Innovations in Quality, Effectiveness and Safety at the Michael E. DeBakey Veterans Affairs Medical Center [CIN 13-413]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

To assess complications of condom catheters compared with indwelling urethral catheters, we conducted a prospective cohort study in two Veterans Affairs hospitals. Male patients who used a condom catheter or indwelling urethral catheter during their hospital stay were followed for one month by interview and medical record review. Participants included 36 men who used condom catheters and 44 who used indwelling urethral catheters. At least one catheter-related complication was reported by 80.6% of condom catheter users and 88.6% of indwelling catheter users ( P = .32), and noninfectious complications (eg, leaking urine, pain, or discomfort) were more common than infectious complications in both groups. Condom catheter patients were significantly less likely than indwelling catheter patients to report complications during catheter placement (13.9% vs 43.2%; P < .001). Patients reported approximately three times more noninfectious complications than the number recorded in the medical record. (C) 2020 Society of Hospital Medicine

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available