Journal
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON INFORMATION FORENSICS AND SECURITY
Volume 15, Issue -, Pages 3197-3212Publisher
IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIFS.2020.2985628
Keywords
Gait recognition; Sensors; Smart phones; Legged locomotion; Authentication; Time series analysis; Gait recognition; inertial sensor; person identification; convolutional neural network; recurrent neural network
Funding
- NSFC [U1934215, 91546106, 61872277, 61822207, U1636219]
- State Key Laboratory of Information Engineering in Surveying, Mapping, and Remote Sensing [16S01]
- Hubei Provincial Natural Science Foundation [2018CFB482]
- Ministry of Education of China [6141A02033327]
- Outstanding Youth Foundation of Hubei Province [2017CFA047]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Compared to other biometrics, gait is difficult to conceal and has the advantage of being unobtrusive. Inertial sensors, such as accelerometers and gyroscopes, are often used to capture gait dynamics. These inertial sensors are commonly integrated into smartphones and are widely used by the average person, which makes gait data convenient and inexpensive to collect. In this paper, we study gait recognition using smartphones in the wild. In contrast to traditional methods, which often require a person to walk along a specified road and/or at a normal walking speed, the proposed method collects inertial gait data under unconstrained conditions without knowing when, where, and how the user walks. To obtain good person identification and authentication performance, deep-learning techniques are presented to learn and model the gait biometrics based on walking data. Specifically, a hybrid deep neural network is proposed for robust gait feature representation, where features in the space and time domains are successively abstracted by a convolutional neural network and a recurrent neural network. In the experiments, two datasets collected by smartphones for a total of 118 subjects are used for evaluations. The experiments show that the proposed method achieves higher than 93.5% and 93.7% accuracies in person identification and authentication, respectively.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available