4.7 Article

Combination of self-harm methods and fatal and non-fatal repetition: A cohort study

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages 188-194

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.04.027

Keywords

Self-harm; Suicide; Cohort study [or longitudinal study]

Funding

  1. Department of Health [MS145/0405/021] Funding Source: Medline

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Assessment and aftercare for people who self-harm needs to be related to an understanding of risks of adverse outcomes. We aimed to determine whether self-harm by a combination of methods and its early repetition are associated with adverse outcomes especially non-fatal repetition and suicide. Method: 10,829 consecutive general hospital attendances due to self-harm in one large English city were monitored, through scrutiny of Emergency Department attendances, over three years and followed up to determine the incidence of non-fatal repetition. Subsequent deaths, by any cause and by suicide, were determined from national statistical records. Results: 6155 patients accounted for the 10,829 episodes: 72% by self-poisoning, 21% self-injury, and 746 episodes (7%) due to a combination of methods. After a combined-methods index episode, non-fatal repetition (P = 0.001) and suicide (P = 0.002) occurred sooner and more frequently than it did among those who had self poisoned. Further hospital attendance due to self-harm within a month was associated with a 3.7-fold (95% CI 2.1-6.4) risk of subsequent suicide. Limitations: The data exclude self-harm episodes that do not result in a hospital attendance. Index episodes in the study are not generally life-time first episodes so follow-up data are based on an arbitrary start-point. Both of these limitations are common to all studies of this kind. Conclusions: At psychosocial assessment and the making of aftercare arrangements, combined methods of self harm or another recent episode should be considered 'red-flag' indicators for attention to care.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available