4.7 Article

Oxytocin receptor and G-protein polymorphisms in patients with depression and separation anxiety

Journal

JOURNAL OF AFFECTIVE DISORDERS
Volume 218, Issue -, Pages 365-373

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2017.03.056

Keywords

Separation anxiety; Oxytocin receptor; G beta 3; Depression; Polymorphisms

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: The impact of combined variants of Oxytocin Receptor (OXTR) and G protein beta 3 subunit genes was investigated in relation to retrospective reports of childhood as well as contemporary adult separation anxiety (SA), based on evidence of a beta/gamma dimer-mediated signaling for OXTR. Methods: A case-control association study (225 healthy adults and 188 outpatients with depression) was performed to establish Risk-Combined Genotype (RCG) of the studied variants (OXTR rs53576 and the functional G(33 subunit rs5443). Current SA was evaluated by the ASA-27 and retrospective childhood symptoms by the SASI. GG genotype of OXTR rs53576 combined with T-carrier genotype of GP3 rs5443 represented the RCG. Results: Compared to non-RCG, those with RCG had significantly higher levels of childhood and adult SA. The RCG was significantly associated with childhood SA threshold score (OR=2.85, 90%CI: 1.08-7.50). Childhood SA was, in turn, strongly associated with a threshold SA score in adulthood (OR=15.58; 95% CI: 4.62-52.59). Limitations: Although the overall sample size is sizable, comparisons among subgroups with specific combination of alleles are based on relatively small numbers. Conclusions:: Our study indicates that variations in OXTR and GP3 genes are specifically associated with presence and severity of SA in childhood and adulthood, but not with depression or anxiety in general. Because there is increasing interest in oxytocin in social behavior, the gene-SA associations identified have potential translational and clinical relevance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available