4.6 Article

Examining missed care in community nursing: A cross section survey design

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING
Volume 74, Issue 3, Pages 626-636

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jan.13466

Keywords

cares left undone; community nursing; missed care; nursing workload; omitted care; primary healthcare; quantitative research

Categories

Funding

  1. Irish Nurses and Midwives Organisation [V1072]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo examine the prevalence of missed care in the community nursing. BackgroundPrevious studies have used a missed care framework to identify challenges routine nursing care in acute care environments. Several issues related to quality of care, safe staffing, job satisfaction and poor teamwork. However, this concept has not been examined in the community nursing context. DesignA cross-sectional survey design was used to explore the concept of missed care in community nursing using demographical information, community nursing roles and reasons for missed care. MethodsOnline questionnaires were completed by 458 community nurses in the Republic of Ireland to determine the prevalence of and reasons for missed care (31 July-25 September 2015). Results/FindingsWith a response rate of 29%, findings were above 70% in several routine care responsibilities. Other findings point to a higher level of missed care in nurses who had less than five years' experience and other variables such as age, those who worked additional unpaid hours and there were some regional variations. ConclusionThe results of the study indicate a high prevalence of missed care in the community nurses surveyed and that preventative care was the type of care most likely to be missed. This has serious implications for a nursing service that is preventative in nature and suggests that the missed care framework could benefit workforce planning for community nursing services both in Ireland and elsewhere. Accordingly, policy, practice and educational reforms are fundamental to meet current and future population needs.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available