4.6 Article

Mental Health Disparities Among Canadian Transgender Youth

Journal

JOURNAL OF ADOLESCENT HEALTH
Volume 60, Issue 1, Pages 44-49

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE INC
DOI: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.09.014

Keywords

Transgender; Mental health; Suicide; Depression; Self-harm

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Institute of Gender and Health [MOP 119472]
  2. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  3. Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research, British Columbia, Canada

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: This study documented the prevalence of mental health problems among transgender youth in Canada and made comparisons with population-based studies. This study also compared gender identity subgroups and age subgroups (14-18 and 19-25). Methods: A nonprobability sample of 923 transgender youth from Canada completed an online survey. Participants were recruited through community organizations, health care settings, social media, and researchers' networks. Mental health measures were drawn from the British Columbia Adolescent Health Survey and the Canadian Community Health Survey. Results: Transgender youth had a higher risk of reporting psychological distress, self-harm, major depressive episodes, and suicide. For example, 65% of transgender 14- to 18-year olds seriously considered suicide in the past year compared with 13% in the British Columbia Adolescent Health Survey, and only a quarter of participants reported their mental health was good or excellent. Transgender boys/men and nonbinary youth were most likely to report self-harm and overall mental health remained stable across age subgroups. Conclusions: Although a notable minority of transgender youth did not report negative health outcomes, this study shows the mental health disparities faced by transgender youth in Canada are considerable. (C) 2016 Society for Adolescent Health and Medicine. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available