4.6 Article Proceedings Paper

Are we ready to implement a discard ban in the gulf of Cadiz? Stakeholders' perceptions

Journal

MARINE POLICY
Volume 116, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.marpol.2019.103711

Keywords

Landing obligation; Trawling fleet; Multi-species fishery; Stakeholders; Gulf of Cadiz; Questionnaires

Funding

  1. Portuguese national funds from FCT - Foundation for Science and Technology [UID/Multi/04326/2016]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The European Union Regulation No 1380/2013 revising the Common Fisheries Policy (CFP) aims at addressing the by-catch and discarding problem in commercial fisheries by implementing the Landing Obligation of the regulated species by 2019. At present, the gulf of Cadiz (GoC) landing ports are not ready to comply with this regulation; a number of key issues identified need addressing. Within this framework, the present study focuses on the challenges of finding relevant and efficient management solutions, considering opinions from all relevant stakeholders involved in the trawl fishery. The approach taken in this study involves participatory meetings, questionnaire surveys and interviews with stakeholders, including fishers, local fishery managers, government administrators, national inspectors, non-governmental organizations (NGOs) and scientists. Furthermore, we visited the main fish auctions in the GoC and talked personally to animal sub-products companies regarding their interest in new opportunities based on resources discarded by the trawl fishery. To achieve the goal of improving the management of this specific fishery and to bring it in line with the requirements of the CFP, we conclude that an effective participation of the fishing industry at all stages is of vital importance. Indeed, we advocate that fisheries research efforts should be directed towards management strategies proposed by all relevant actors within the fishery.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available