4.7 Article

Nitrous acid (HONO) emissions under real-world driving conditions from vehicles in a UK road tunnel

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS
Volume 20, Issue 9, Pages 5231-5248

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/acp-20-5231-2020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Natural Environment Research Council [NE/M013545/1, NE/M010554/1]
  2. NERC [NE/M013545/1, NE/M010554/1, NE/M013405/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Measurements of atmospheric boundary layer nitrous acid (HONO) and nitrogen oxides (NOx) were performed in summer 2016 inside a city centre road tunnel in Birmingham, United Kingdom. HONO and NOx mixing ratios were strongly correlated with traffic density, with peak levels observed during the early evening rush hour as a result of traffic congestion in the tunnel. A day-time Delta HONO/Delta NOx ratio of 0.85 % (0.72 % to 1.01 %, 95 % confidence interval) was calculated using reduced major axis regression for the overall fleet average (comprising 59 % diesel-fuelled vehicles). A comparison with previous tunnel studies and analysis on the composition of the fleet suggest that goods vehicles have a large impact on the overall HONO vehicle emissions; however, new technologies aimed at reducing exhaust emissions, particularly for diesel vehicles, may have reduced the overall direct HONO emission in the UK. This result suggests that in order to accurately represent urban atmospheric emissions and the OH radical budget, fleet-weighted HONO/NOx ratios may better quantify HONO vehicle emissions in models, compared with the use of a single emissions ratio for all vehicles. The contribution of the direct vehicular source of HONO to total ambient HONO concentrations is also investigated and results show that, in areas with high traffic density, vehicle exhaust emissions are likely to be the dominant HONO source to the boundary layer.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available