4.7 Article

Learning Nonnegative Factors From Tensor Data: Probabilistic Modeling and Inference Algorithm

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SIGNAL PROCESSING
Volume 68, Issue -, Pages 1792-1806

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSP.2020.2975353

Keywords

Tensile stress; Probabilistic logic; Signal processing algorithms; Inference algorithms; Data mining; Computational modeling; Data models; Tensor decomposition; nonnegative factors; variational inference; automatic rank determination

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2018YFB1800800]
  2. Guangdong Basic and Applied Basic Research Foundation [2019A1515111140]
  3. Shenzhen Peacock Plan [KQTD2015033114415450]
  4. Shenzhen Research Institute of Big Data [2019ORF01012]
  5. HongKong Research Grant Council [17207018]
  6. U.S. National Science Foundation [CCF-1908308]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Tensor canonical polyadic decomposition (CPD) with nonnegative factor matrices, which extracts useful latent information from multidimensional data, has found wide-spread applications in various big data analytic tasks. Currently, the implementation of most existing algorithms needs the knowledge of tensor rank. However, this information is practically unknown and difficult to acquire. To address this issue, a probabilistic approach is taken in this paper. Different from previous works, this paper firstly introduces a sparsity-promoting nonnegative Gaussian-gamma prior, based on which a novel probabilistic model for the CPD problem with nonnegative and continuous factors is established. This probabilistic model further enables the derivation of an efficient inference algorithm that accurately learns the nonnegative factors from the tensor data, along with an integrated feature of automatic rank determination. Numerical results using synthetic data and real-world applications are presented to show the remarkable performance of the proposed algorithm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available