4.0 Article

Preliminary evaluation of military, commercial and novel skin decontamination products against a chemical warfare agent simulant (methyl salicylate)

Journal

CUTANEOUS AND OCULAR TOXICOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 2, Pages 137-144

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.3109/15569527.2015.1072544

Keywords

methyl salicylate; skin; chemical warfare agent; Absorbent; decontamination; percutaneous absorption

Funding

  1. Department of Health (England) as part of the ORCHIDS research programme

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rapid decontamination is vital to alleviate adverse health effects following dermal exposure to hazardous materials. There is an abundance of materials and products which can be utilised to remove hazardous materials from the skin. In this study, a total of 15 products were evaluated, 10 of which were commercial or military products and five were novel (molecular imprinted) polymers. The efficacies of these products were evaluated against a 10 mu l droplet of C-14-methyl salicylate applied to the surface of porcine skin mounted on static diffusion cells. The current UK military decontaminant (Fuller's earth) performed well, retaining 83% of the dose over 24 h and served as a benchmark to compare with the other test products. The five most effective test products were Fuller's earth (the current UK military decontaminant), Fast-Act (R) and three novel polymers [based on itaconic acid, 2-trifluoromethylacrylic acid and N,N-methylenebis(acrylamide)]. Five products (medical moist-free wipes, 5% FloraFree (TM) solution, normal baby wipes, baby wipes for sensitive skin and Diphoterine (TM)) enhanced the dermal absorption of C-14-methyl salicylate. Further work is required to establish the performance of the most effective products identified in this study against chemical warfare agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.0
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available