4.4 Article

Boldness and predator evasion in naturally hybridizing swordtails (Teleostei: Xiphophorus)

Journal

CURRENT ZOOLOGY
Volume 61, Issue 4, Pages 596-603

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/czoolo/61.4.596

Keywords

Trait compensation; Fast-Start; Anti-predator behavior; hybridization; Behavioral syndrome; Animal personality

Categories

Funding

  1. National Science Foundation [IOS-0923825]
  2. Undergraduate Program in Biological and Mathematical Sciences (UBM
  3. National Science Foundation) [DBI-1029401]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Correlations among behavioral traits can generate trade-offs and constrain phenotypic evolution. Interspecific hybridization has the potential to alter behavioral trait correlations, but the effect of hybridization on suites of behavioral traits has received relatively little attention. We evaluated how natural hybridization changes the relationship between boldness (time of emergence and proportion of time out of shelter) and response to a simulated predator threat in swordtails (Teleostei: Xiphophorus). In poeciliid fishes, bold individuals have increased survival in the presence of predators. This non-intuitive observation may arise as a result of bold individuals being more likely to engage in anti-predator behaviors. Contrary to our prediction, bold individuals were less likely to perform a fast-start response to a predator threat. This correlation was consistent among populations and species but was only significant in hybrids. The observed correlation between boldness and anti-predator behavior could impact hybrid fitness and the evolvability of hybrid lineages. More generally, our findings suggest that hybridization could influence the integration of behavioral phenotypes, as has been amply documented for morphology. Animal personality and behavioral syndromes could therefore play an important role in the evolutionary fate of natural hybrids

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available