Journal
NEUROLOGY AND THERAPY
Volume 9, Issue 1, Pages 67-83Publisher
SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s40120-019-00172-5
Keywords
Claims data; Costs; Germany; HCRU; Multiple sclerosis; Real-world treatment
Categories
Funding
- Roche Pharma AG [NA] Funding Source: Medline
Ask authors/readers for more resources
Introduction The aim of this study was to describe the real-word treatment and associated healthcare resource use (HCRU) of multiple sclerosis (MS) patients, as stratified by different MS subtypes. Methods All patients with MS continuously insured by two German statutory healthcare insurance funds from 2011 to 2015 were enrolled. These patients were categorized into four subgroups according to their MS type as follows: clinically isolated syndrome (CIS); relapsing remittent MS (RRMS); primary progressive MS (PPMS); and secondary progressive MS (SPMS). Sociodemographic characteristics, treatments, and HCRU for 2015 were analyzed. Treatment cascades for treatment-naive patients were also determined. Results A total of 13,333 patients with MS were identified. The largest proportion of patients had RRMS (41.9%), followed by PPMS (17.1%). Mean age of the enrolled patients was 50.2 years, and 70.7% were female. Among all patients, 38.3% of those with CIS, 22.4% with PPMS, 69.6% with RRMS, and 33.9% with SPMS received a prescription of a disease-modifying immunomodulatory agent, with interferon beta-1a being the most frequently prescribed agent. Likewise, 14.5, 18.5, 19.9, and 21.5% of patients with CIS, PPMS, RRMS, and SPMS, respectively, received a flare-up treatment with glucocorticoids. MS-associated overall costs, including indirect costs for MS-associated days absent from work, were euro 16,433, with costs related to MS medication (euro 8770; 53.4%) being the main driver of costs in all subgroups. MS-associated costs according to MS subtypes were euro 12,427 for CIS patients, euro 14,459 for PPMS patients, euro 20,583 for RRMS patients, and euro 17,554 for SPMS patients. Conclusion Among the four MS subtypes, RRMS patients most often received a disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment. Consequently, healthcare costs were highest for patients with this MS subtype. Contrary to the treatment guideline, a substantial percentage of patients with CIS, RRMS, and SPMS did not receive any disease-modifying immunomodulatory treatment.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available