4.7 Review

Discrimination and Calibration of Clinical Prediction Models Users' Guides to the Medical Literature

Journal

JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION
Volume 318, Issue 14, Pages 1377-1384

Publisher

AMER MEDICAL ASSOC
DOI: 10.1001/jama.2017.12126

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Abbott Diagnostics
  2. Boehringer Ingelheim
  3. Covidien
  4. Octapharma
  5. Roche Dignostics
  6. Stryker

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Accurate nformation regarding prognosis s fundamental to optimal clinical care. The best approach to assess patient prognosis relies on prediction models that simultaneously consider a number of prognostic factors and provide an estimate of patients' absolute risk of an event. Such prediction models should be characterized by adequately discriminating between patients who will have an event and those who will not and by adequate calibration ensuring accurate prediction of absolute risk. This Users' Guide will help clinicians understand the available metrics for assessing discrimination, calibration, and the relative performance of different prediction models. This article complements existing Users' Guides that address the development and validation of prediction models. Together, these guides will help clinicians to make optimal use of existing prediction models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available