3.8 Article

A Comparative Effectiveness Study of Newborn Screening Methods for Four Lysosomal Storage Disorders

Journal

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/ijns6020044

Keywords

newborn screening; Fabry disease; Gaucher disease; mucopolysaccharidosis type I; Pompe disease; tandem mass spectrometry; immunoassay; microfluidics; bioinformatics; post-analytical interpretation

Funding

  1. Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health [HHSN275201000017C]
  2. Legacy of Angels Foundation
  3. Newborn Screening Translational Research Network [HHSN275200800001C 01]
  4. Friedreich's Ataxia Research Alliance (FARA)
  5. T. Denny Sanford Professorship fund
  6. Mayo Clinic's Department of Laboratory Medicine and Pathology

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Newborn screening for one or more lysosomal disorders has been implemented in several US states, Japan and Taiwan by multiplexed enzyme assays using either tandem mass spectrometry or digital microfluidics. Another multiplex assay making use of immunocapture technology has also been proposed. To investigate the potential variability in performance of these analytical approaches, we implemented three high-throughput screening assays for the simultaneous screening for four lysosomal disorders: Fabry disease, Gaucher disease, mucopolysaccharidosis type I, and Pompe disease. These assays were tested in a prospective comparative effectiveness study using nearly 100,000 residual newborn dried blood spot specimens. In addition, 2nd tier enzyme assays and confirmatory molecular genetic testing were employed. Post-analytical interpretive tools were created using the software Collaborative Laboratory Integrated Reports (CLIR) to determine its ability to improve the performance of each assay vs. the traditional result interpretation based on analyte-specific reference ranges and cutoffs. This study showed that all three platforms have high sensitivity, and the application of CLIR tools markedly improves the performance of each platform while reducing the need for 2nd tier testing by 66% to 95%. Moreover, the addition of disease-specific biochemical 2nd tier tests ensures the lowest false positive rates and the highest positive predictive values for any platform.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available