4.2 Article

Evaluation of a continuous neonatal temperature monitor for low-resource settings: a device feasibility pilot study

Journal

BMJ PAEDIATRICS OPEN
Volume 4, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMJ PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1136/bmjpo-2020-000655

Keywords

neonatology; paediatric practice; intensive care

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

ObjectiveEvaluate a novel continuous temperature monitor in a low-resource neonatal ward.DesignWe developed a low-cost continuous neonatal temperature monitor (NTM) for use in low-resource settings. Accuracy of NTM was initially assessed in the laboratory. Clinical evaluation then was performed in a neonatal ward in a central hospital in Malawi; eligible neonates (<1week of age) were recruited for continuous temperature monitoring with NTM and a Philips Intellivue MP30 Patient Monitor.Interventions and outcome measuresThe temperature probes of NTM and the reference patient monitor were attached to the infant's abdomen, and core temperature was continuously recorded for up to 3hours. Axillary temperatures were taken every hour. We compared temperatures measured using NTM, the patient monitor and the axillary thermometer.ResultsLaboratory temperature measurements obtained with NTM were within 0.059 degrees C (range: -0.035 degrees C to 0.195 degrees C) of a reference thermometer. A total of 39 patients were recruited to participate in the clinical evaluation of NTM; data from four patients were excluded due to faulty hardware connections. The mean difference in measured temperatures between the NTM and the Intellivue MP30 was -0.04 degrees C (95%CI -0.52 degrees C to 0.44 degrees C).ConclusionNTM meets ISO 80601-2-56 standards for accuracy and is an appropriate, low-cost continuous temperature monitor for neonatal wards in low-resource settings.Trial registration numbersNCT03965312 and NCT03866122.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available