4.6 Article

Metal-organic framework-derived Fe/Cu-substituted Co nanoparticles embedded in CNTs-grafted carbon polyhedron for Zn-air batteries

Journal

CARBON ENERGY
Volume 2, Issue 2, Pages 283-293

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/cey2.35

Keywords

electrocatalysis; lattice sites substitution; metal-organic frameworks; oxygen reduction reaction; zinc-air battery

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51825201, 51772008]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFA0206701]
  3. National Program for Support of Top-notch Young Professionals
  4. Changjiang Scholar Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) and MOF-derived materials have attracted great attention as alternatives to noble-metal based electrocatalysts owing to their intriguing structure properties, especially for high efficiency and stable oxygen reduction reaction (ORR). Herein, we employed a one-pot reaction to make a multimetal (Fe, Co, Cu, and Zn) mixed zeolitic imidazolate framework (MM-ZIF) via adopting a simple in situ redox reaction. Further pyrolysis of the target MM-ZIF, a highly porous carbon polyhedron (FC-C@NC) grafted with abundant carbon nanotubes was obtained, in which ultrasmall Co nanoparticles with partial lattice sites substituted by Fe and Cu were embedded. The obtained FC-C@NC possessed large surface area, highly porous structure, widely-spread metal active sites, and conductive carbon frameworks, contributing to outstanding ORR activity and long-term stability. It displayed superior tolerance to methanol crossover and exceeded the commercial Pt/C catalyst and most previously reported non-noble-metal catalysts. Impressively, the as-produced FC-C@NC-based zinc-air battery afforded an open-circuit potential of 1.466V, a large specific capacity of 659.5mAh/g, and a high gravimetric energy density of 784.3Wh/kg(Zn), significantly outperforming the Pt/C-based cathode.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available