4.6 Article

Neutral pH aqueous redox flow batteries using an anthraquinone-ferrocyanide redox couple

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY C
Volume 8, Issue 17, Pages 5727-5731

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0tc00640h

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Korea Institute of Energy Technology Evaluation and Planning (KETEP)
  2. Ministry of Trade, Industry & Energy (MOTIE) of the Republic of Korea [20172420108550]
  3. National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF)
  4. Ministry of Education (MOE) [2019R1A2C1005776]
  5. Korea Evaluation Institute of Industrial Technology (KEIT) [20172420108550] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Anthraquinone-2,7-disulfonic acid (2,7-AQDS) and ferrocyanide including potassium and sodium salts are used as a redox couple for neutral aqueous redox flow batteries (ARFBs). In 1 M potassium chloride (KCl) electrolyte of neutral pH, the electron transfer rate and redox reactivity of 2,7-AQDS are better than those in acidic electrolyte. Furthermore, ferrocyanide is attacked by the hydroxyl group within the alkaline electrolyte, however this does not happen in KCl because there are no hydroxyl groups in KCl. The low solubility of 2,7-AQDS is enhanced in 1 M KCl using an ethyleneglycol (EG) additive and the solubility of the ferrocyanide also increases when using the mixed cations of potassium and sodium. This benefit arises because of the fact that the EG additive forms hydrogen bonds with water within the electrolyte and 2,7-AQDS, while ferrocyanide mixed with different cations increases the solubility due to ion pair formation. Based on that, the ARFB using 2,7-AQDS and ferrocyanide shows high coulombic efficiency (98% at 40 mA cm(-2)) and capacity (17.8 A h L-1) with a low capacity decay rate (>99% until 100 cycle).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available