4.7 Article

Detection of weak magnetic fields in two HgMn stars

Journal

MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY
Volume 495, Issue 1, Pages L97-L101

Publisher

OXFORD UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1093/mnrasl/slaa064

Keywords

binaries: spectroscopic; stars: chemically peculiar; stars: individual: HD221507, HD65949, HD101189; stars: magnetic field; stars: variables: general

Funding

  1. La Silla Paranal Observatory [083.D1000, 084.D-0338, 086.D-0240, 187.D-0917, 089.D-0383, 091.D0759, 0103.C-0240]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The main-sequence mercury-manganese (HgMn) stars are known to exhibit large overabundances of exotic elements and, similar to magnetic Ap/Bp stars, are spectrum variables, implying the presence of an inhomogeneous element distribution over the stellar surface. A number of magnetic field studies have been attempted in the last decades, indicating that magnetic fields in HgMn stars, if they exist, should be rather weak. The presence of tangled magnetic fields was suggested by several authors who detected quadratic magnetic fields using the moment technique. We employ the least-squares deconvolution technique to carry out a sensitive search for weak magnetic fields in spectropolarimetric observations of three HgMn stars, HD221507, HD65949, and HD101189, which have different fundamental parameters and spectral characteristics. A definite weak longitudinal field is discovered in HD221507 and HD65949 on single epochs, while only marginal field detections were achieved for HD101189. The new measurements indicate that the structure of the magnetic fields is probably rather complex: our analysis reveals the presence of reversed Stokes V profiles at the same observational epoch if individual elements are used in the measurements. This is the first observational evidence that individual elements sample distinct local magnetic fields of different polarity across the stellar surface.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available