4.2 Article

The drivers of E-banking entrepreneurship: an empirical study

Journal

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF BANK MARKETING
Volume 38, Issue 2, Pages 485-500

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/IJBM-03-2019-0113

Keywords

Innovation; Top management support; Social capital; Risk-taking; Proactiveness; E-banking entrepreneurship

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose - The purpose of this paper is to investigate the drivers of e-banking entrepreneurship. The impact of e-banking entrepreneurship on banks' performance in the banking industry is also investigated. Design/methodology/approach - A questionnaire was developed to collect data from 16 banks with a sample of 214 respondents. Structural equation modeling using PLS was conducted to analyze the data. Findings - The results reveal a significant impact of top management support, organizational context, technological context and social capital on the degree of e-business entrepreneurship. The findings also reveal a direct impact of e-banking entrepreneurship on achieving a competitive advantage, financial performance and customer performance. Originality/value - The present empirical study contributes to a better understanding of the existing theories and practices of banking entrepreneurship and e-innovations in today's banking industry. This study also provides insights into the drivers and the role of e-entrepreneurship in this industry for improving the opportunities of competitiveness and growth. The findings of the present study are of importance to both academic and practitioner audiences. The present study provides empirical evidence to bolster e-banking technology as an enabler of banking entrepreneurship and improving performance. Additionally, these findings provide directives to managers regarding the untapped opportunities and potential that innovative e-banking technology can offer in a highly volatile and rapidly changing environment.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available