3.9 Article

Social Science Sequestered

Journal

FRONTIERS IN CLIMATE
Volume 2, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fclim.2020.00002

Keywords

humanities and social sciences; GGR research; marginalized; constrained; depoliticised; UK GGR programme; research policy principles

Funding

  1. UK GGR programme [NE/P019838/1, NE/P019900/1, NE/P019951/1, NE/P019668/1, NE/P01982X/1]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Greenhouse gas removal (GGR) raises many cultural, ethical, legal, social, and political issues, yet in the growing area of GGR research, humanities and social sciences (HASS) research is often marginalized, constrained and depoliticised. This global dynamic is illustrated by an analysis of the UK GGR research programme. This dynamic matters for the knowledge produced and for its users. Without HASS contributions, too narrow a range of perspectives, futures and issues will be considered, undermining or overpromising the prospects for the responsible development of GGR (and threatening worse side-effects), and limiting our understanding of why and how policy demands GGR solutions in the first place. In response, we present policy principles for bringing HASS fully into GGR research, organized around three themes: (1) HASS-led GGR research, (2) Opening up GGR futures, and (3) The politics of GGR futures.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.9
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available