4.3 Article

From Practices to Values: Farmers' Relationship with Soil Biodiversity in Europe

Journal

SOCIOLOGIA RURALIS
Volume 60, Issue 3, Pages 596-620

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/soru.12303

Keywords

agriculture; focus group; plural values; pragmatism; soil biota

Funding

  1. 2015-16 BiodivERsA COFUND [01LC1620]
  2. national funders Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF)
  3. French National Research Agency (ANR)
  4. Swedish Research Council for Environment, Agricultural Sciences and Spatial Planning (FORMAS)
  5. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness (MINECO)
  6. Executive Agency for Higher Education, Research, Development and Innovation Funding (UEFISCDI)
  7. Estonian Research Council (ETAG)
  8. French Environment and Energy Management Agency (ADEME)
  9. University of Rennes 1

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Agriculture benefits from soil functions, whereof many depend on soil biota, but some management practices can threaten soil organisms. We inventoried values that European farmers associate to soils and soil biota into their soil management decisions. We used Dewey's pragmatic epistemology, stating that values can be observed through active behaviours, attitudes and communication acts. We applied a plural values framework on a dataset composed of 35 scientific articles and five focus groups. Farmers saw the soil as a single object. They hardly distinguished soil biota from other elements in their soils. Soil biota remained poorly known and little valued. Besides instrumental values, many other values, such as soil ecosystem resilience, influence farmers' management choices. We conclude that soils and soil biota values are plural and that they can evolve along with changes in farmers' practices. Further studies investigating values dynamics in time and space could be beneficial for designing an effective European soil conservation policy.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available