4.8 Article

Patterns of bacterial diversity in the marine planktonic particulate matter continuum

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 999-1010

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2016.166

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science and Innovation [CTM2009-09352, CTM2011-23458, CTM2012-34294, CTM2015-70340-R, CTM2015-65720-R]
  2. Ministry of Economy and Competitiveness [CTM2009-09352, CTM2011-23458, CTM2012-34294, CTM2015-70340-R, CTM2015-65720-R]
  3. CSIC
  4. Ministry of Labor, Employment and Social Security
  5. Spanish Ministery of Economy and Competitiveness

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Depending on their relationship with the pelagic particulate matter, planktonic prokaryotes have traditionally been classified into two types of communities: free-living (FL) or attached (ATT) to particles, and are generally separated using only one pore-size filter in a differential filtration. Nonetheless, particulate matter in the oceans appears in a continuum of sizes. Here we separated this continuum into six discrete size-fractions, from 0.2 to 200 mu m, and described the prokaryotes associated to each of them. Each size-fraction presented different bacterial communities, with a range of 23-42% of unique (OTUs) in each size-fraction, supporting the idea that they contained distinct types of particles. An increase in richness was observed from the smallest to the largest sizefractions, suggesting that increasingly larger particles contributed new niches. Our results show that a multiple size-fractionation provides a more exhaustive description of the bacterial diversity and community structure than the use of only one filter. In addition, and based on our results, we propose an alternative to the dichotomy of FL or ATT lifestyles, in which we differentiate the taxonomic groups with preference for the smaller fractions, those that do not show preferences for small or large fractions, and those that preferentially appear in larger fractions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available