4.8 Article

Microbial survival strategies in ancient permafrost: insights from metagenomics

Journal

ISME JOURNAL
Volume 11, Issue 10, Pages 2305-2318

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/ismej.2017.93

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA) [NNX15AM12G, NNH15AB58I]
  2. United States Geological Survey (USGS)
  3. California State University Program for Education and Research in Biotechnology (CSUPERB)
  4. US Army Engineer Research and Development Center
  5. USGS
  6. NASA [NNX15AM12G, NNH15AB58I]
  7. CSUPERB
  8. NASA [NNX15AM12G, 805766] Funding Source: Federal RePORTER

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In permafrost (perennially frozen ground) microbes survive oligotrophic conditions, sub-zero temperatures, low water availability and high salinity over millennia. Viable life exists in permafrost tens of thousands of years old but we know little about the metabolic and physiological adaptations to the challenges presented by life in frozen ground over geologic time. In this study we asked whether increasing age and the associated stressors drive adaptive changes in community composition and function. We conducted deep metagenomic and 16 S rRNA gene sequencing across a Pleistocene permafrost chronosequence from 19 000 to 33 000 years before present (kyr). We found that age markedly affected community composition and reduced diversity. Reconstruction of paleovegetation from metagenomic sequence suggests vegetation differences in the paleo record are not responsible for shifts in community composition and function. Rather, we observed shifts consistent with long-term survival strategies in extreme cryogenic environments. These include increased reliance on scavenging detrital biomass, horizontal gene transfer, chemotaxis, dormancy, environmental sensing and stress response. Our results identify traits that may enable survival in ancient cryoenvironments with no influx of energy or new materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available