4.4 Article

Evaluation of Infiltration Models and Variability of Soil Infiltration Properties at Multiple Scales

Journal

IRRIGATION AND DRAINAGE
Volume 66, Issue 4, Pages 589-599

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/ird.2126

Keywords

Kostiakov-Lewis model; normalization factor; multifractal technique; pedotransfer function

Funding

  1. Natural Science Foundation of China [51579205, 51209171]
  2. National Program on Key Research Projects during the 13th Five-Year Plan Period [2016YFC0400203]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Shaanxi Province [2016JM5053]
  4. Scientific Research Program - Shaanxi Provincial Education Department [15JS064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Soil infiltration is characterized by scale dependence, so the accuracy and reliability of indirect methods used to estimate soil infiltration properties from available soil physical data are often below expectations. This study aimed to determine the scale-dependent relationship between soil infiltration and soil physical properties and to establish pedotransfer functions (PTFs) for estimating normalization factors (F-C). Field studies were conducted using double-ring infiltrometers in the first (sandy loam) and third (clay loam) terraces in Yangling District. Multiple scale variability and relationships were studied by multifractal and joint multifractal techniques. Results indicated that the Kostiakov-Lewis model best described the relationship between cumulative infiltration and time in the study areas, and that the normalization equation for predicting cumulative infiltration was accurate. Joint multifractal analysis showed that the variability of F-C in the first terrace was related largely to sand content, soil bulk density, and silt content. F-C in the third terrace depended on the contents of sand, silt, initial soil water, and clay at multiple scales. The PTFs that were established based on the results of joint multifractal analysis reliably estimated F-C values. Copyright (c) 2017 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available