4.6 Article

Interplay between aggregation number, micelle charge and hydration of catanionic surfactants

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 18, Pages 9998-10009

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp00877j

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst [57360142]
  2. Slovenian Research Agency [P1-0201]
  3. [BI-DE/17-19-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Catanionic mixtures are commonly used in applications due to synergetic properties of both cationic and anionic surfactants. To better understand the mechanism of the micellization process of salt-free catanionic surfactants, alkyltrimethylammonium alkanecarboxylates, [CxMe3N](+)[C-y](-), with medium to long alkyl chains on both cation and anion (x,y = 6-10), were investigated in aqueous solution by density and zeta potential measurements, isothermal titration calorimetry (ITC), and dielectric relaxation spectroscopy (DRS). The obtained ITC data was analysed with the help of a two-step model equation, yielding the thermodynamic parameters, micelle charge and aggregation numbers. Comparison with the parent decyltrimethylammonium chloride and sodium decanoate reveals that combined dehydration of both alkyl chains increases entropy upon micellization. In the first step neutral smaller micelles with partly dehydrated alkyl chains are formed, while in the second step larger charged micelles with fully dehydrated alkyl chains are equally favourable. At low temperature both formations are thermodynamically equivalent, while with increasing temperature neutral micelles become more entropically favourable and charged micelles more enthalpically favourable. The resulting average micelle charge and average aggregation number are decreasing with temperature. From the DRS spectra, effective hydration numbers of the free monomers and micelles were deduced and are comparable to the parent cationic surfactant micelles.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available