4.2 Article

Urine trouble: should we think differently about UTI?

Journal

INTERNATIONAL UROGYNECOLOGY JOURNAL
Volume 29, Issue 2, Pages 205-210

Publisher

SPRINGER LONDON LTD
DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3528-8

Keywords

Diagnostics; Escherichia coli; Microbiome; Pathogens; Urinalysis; Urinary tract infection

Funding

  1. NIH grants [2 U10 HD41250, U01 DK58229, R21 DK097435, R56 DK104718, P20 DK108268, R01 DK104718]
  2. Falk Foundation
  3. Loyola University Chicago [RFC LU206998]
  4. Astellas Scientific and Medical Affairs Inc. [VESI-12D01, MYRB-15A01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Urinary tract infection (UTI) is clinically important, given that it is one of the most common bacterial infections in adult women. However, the current understanding of UTI remains based on a now disproven concept that the urinary bladder is sterile. Thus, current standards for UTI diagnosis have significant limitations that may reduce the opportunity to improve patient care. Using data from our work and numerous other peer-reviewed studies, we identified four major limitations to the contemporary UTI description: the language of UTI, UTI diagnostic testing, the Escherichia coli-centric view of UTI, and the colony-forming units (CFU) threshold-based diagnosis. Contemporary methods and technology, combined with continued rigorous clinical research can be used to correct these limitations.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available