4.5 Article

Caregivers' attitude toward disclosure of Alzheimer's disease diagnosis in Urban China

Journal

INTERNATIONAL PSYCHOGERIATRICS
Volume 29, Issue 11, Pages 1849-1855

Publisher

CAMBRIDGE UNIV PRESS
DOI: 10.1017/S1041610217001132

Keywords

Alzheimer's disease; dementia

Funding

  1. Shanghai Education Development Foundation
  2. Shanghai Municipal Education Commission

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background: Disclosing the diagnosis of Alzheimer's disease (AD) to a patient is controversial. There is significant stigma associated with a diagnosis of AD or dementia in China, but the attitude of the society toward disclosure of such a diagnosis had not been formally evaluated prior to our study. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the attitude toward disclosing an AD diagnosis to patients in China with cognitive impairment from their caregivers, and the factors that may affect their attitude. Methods: We designed a 17-item questionnaire and administered this questionnaire to caregivers, who accompanied patients with cognitive impairment or dementia in three major hospitals in Shanghai, China. The caregiver's attitude toward disclosing the diagnosis of AD as evaluated by the questionnaire was compared to that of disclosing the diagnosis of terminal cancer. Results: A majority (95.7%) of the 175 interviewed participants (mean 14.2 years of education received) wished to know their own diagnosis if they were diagnosed with AD, and 97.6% preferred the doctor to tell their family members if they were diagnosed with AD. If a family member of the participants suffered from AD, 82.9% preferred to have the diagnosis disclosed to the patient. Cognitive impairment was the most accepted term by caregivers to disclose AD diagnosis in Chinese. Conclusion: This study suggests most of the well-educated individuals in a Chinese urban area favored disclosing the diagnosis when they or their family members were diagnosed with AD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available