4.8 Article

Observation of binding of carbon dioxide to nitro-decorated metal-organic frameworks

Journal

CHEMICAL SCIENCE
Volume 11, Issue 20, Pages 5339-5346

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9sc04294f

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. EPSRC [EP/I011870]
  2. Royal Society
  3. University of Manchester
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [742401]
  5. Scientific User Facilities Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, US DOE [DE-AC0500OR22725]
  6. UT Battelle, LLC
  7. Laboratory Directed Research and Development program
  8. Compute and Data Environment for Science (CADES) at ORNL
  9. EPSRC [EP/P001386/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Metal-organic frameworks (MOFs) functionalised with amine, amide and hydroxyl groups show great promise for CO2 binding due to their ability to form hydrogen bonds to CO2. Herein we report the adsorption and selectivity of CO2 in four iso-reticular MOFs adopting the NbO topology. Functionalisation of the parent MOF, MFM-102, with -NO2, -NH2 and alkyl groups leads to an enhancement of CO2 adsorption of up to 36% for the NO2-decorated MOF and with raised selectivity. MFM-102-NO2 shows the highest adsorption capacity for CO2 (184 cm(3) g(-1) at 273 K and 1.0 bar) within this series, comparable to the best-behaving iso-reticular MOFs. At 298 K and 1.0 bar, MFM-102-NO2 shows a CO2/CH4 selectivity of 5.0. In situ inelastic neutron scattering and synchrotron FT-IR micro-spectroscopy were employed to elucidate the host-guest interaction dynamics within CO2-loaded MFM-102-NO2. Neutron powder diffraction enabled the direct observation of the preferred binding domains in MFM-102-NO2, and, to the best of our knowledge, we report the first example of CO2 binding to a -NO2 group in a porous MOF. Synergistic effects between the -NO2 group and the open metal sites lead to optimal binding of CO2 molecules within MFM-102-NO(2)via hydrogen bonding to C-H groups.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available