4.3 Article

Respiratory medication use in primary care among COPD subjects in four Latin American countries

Journal

Publisher

INT UNION AGAINST TUBERCULOSIS LUNG DISEASE (I U A T L D)
DOI: 10.5588/ijtld.16.0633

Keywords

case finding; COPD; PUMA; primary care; treatment

Funding

  1. AstraZeneca

Ask authors/readers for more resources

OBJECTIVES: To assess respiratory medications used, factors predicting treatment and patterns of corticosteroid (CS) use in primary care in Latin America among chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients. METHODS: COPD was defined as post-bronchodilator forced expiratory volume in 1 s/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC) < 0.70 or previous medical diagnosis. To determine factors associated with respiratory medication use, crude and adjusted Poisson regression models were performed. RESULTS: Of 1743 patients interviewed, 1540 completed spirometry, 309 had COPD (FEV1/FVC<0.70) and 102 had a prior diagnosis of COPD. Among spirometrydefined COPD patients, 36.6% used respiratory medications: bronchodilators (BD) 24.9%, CS 13.3%, BD+CS 15.2%. In those with a previous diagnosis, 79.4% used respiratory medications: BD 64.7%, CS 37.6%, BD-i-CS 25.6%. A total of 81/102 (79%) patients with prior diagnosis were using CS despite not having airway obstruction or exacerbation. In spirometry-defined COPD, dyspnoea (OR 2.09, 95%CI 1.133.87), severe airway obstruction (OR 3.36, 95 %CI 1.40-8.03) and exacerbation in the past year (OR 5.52, 95%CI 2.19-13.89) were associated with increased respiratory medication use. Among those with a previous diagnosis, use of respiratory medications was associated with cough (OR 5.31, 95%CI 1.28-22.12), severe airway obstruction (OR 29.50, 95%CI 3.18273.30) and fewer years of schooling (OR 0.12, 95%CI 0.03-0.52). CONCLUSIONS: In the primary care setting, under treatment is frequent in spirometry-defined COPD patients, and there is increased use of CS (overtreatment) in patients with a previous diagnosis of COPD.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available