4.7 Article

Joint lattice QCD-dispersion theory analysis confirms the quark-mixing top-row unitarity deficit

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 101, Issue 11, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.111301

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. DFG [TRR110, CRC 110]
  2. NSFC [CRC 110, 11621131001]
  3. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation through the Humboldt Research Fellowship
  4. EU Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, STRONG-2020 project [824093]
  5. German-Mexican research collaboration Grant [278017, SP 778/4-1]
  6. NSFC of China [11775002]
  7. DOE [DE-SC0010339]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recently, the first ever lattice computation of the gamma W-box radiative correction to the rate of the semileptonic pion decay allowed for a reduction of the theory uncertainty of that rate by a factor of similar to 3. A recent dispersion evaluation of the gamma W-box correction on the neutron also led to a significant reduction of the theory uncertainty, but shifted the value of V-ud extracted from the neutron and superallowed nuclear beta decay, resulting in a deficit of the Cabibbo-Kobayashi-Maskawa (CKM) unitarity in the top row. A direct lattice computation of the gamma W-box correction for the neutron decay would provide an independent crosscheck for this result but is very challenging. Before those challenges are overcome, we propose a hybrid analysis, converting the lattice calculation on the pion to that on the neutron by a combination of dispersion theory and phenomenological input. The new prediction for the universal radiative correction to free and bound neutron beta-decay reads Delta(V)(R) = 0.02477(24), in excellent agreement with the dispersion theory result Delta(V)(R) = 0.02467(22). Combining with other relevant information, the top-row CKM unitarity deficit persists.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available