4.6 Article

Laboratory Study of Rate Coefficients for H2:H2 Inelastic Collisions between 295 and 20K

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES
Volume 247, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4365/ab5e80

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovacion (MICINN)
  2. Economia y Competitividad (MINECO) [CONSOLIDER ASTROMOL CSD2009-0038, FIS2010-22064-C01, FIS2013-48275-C2-2-P, FIS201784391-C2-1-P]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A laboratory study of state-to-state rate coefficients (STS rates) for H-2:H-2 inelastic collisions in the v = 0 state is reported. The study, which spans the 295-20 K thermal range, is based on the use of a kinetic master equation. It describes the time-space evolution of populations of H-2 rotational levels as induced by inelastic collisions. It is applied here to a supersonic jet of natural H-2. This medium bears a large amount of relevant data that allows for the establishment of best values and confidence margins for the dominant STS rates of H-2:H-2 inelastic collisions on an experimental basis. The primary experimental data derived from the supersonic jet are the local number density, the populations of the H-2 rotational levels, and their gradients along the jet by means of high-sensitivity Raman spectroscopy with superb space resolution. First, two sets of theoretical STS rates from the literature have been tested against the experiment. The set that shows a better agreement with the experiment has then been scaled to derive an improved set of experiment-scaled STS rates (ES rates). They allow the reproduction of more than 50 experimental population gradient data within a standard deviation <1.4% along the 295-20 K thermal range. The estimated uncertainty for the ES rates ranges from similar to 3% near 300 K to similar to 6% near 20 K. ES rates and uncertainties for H-2:H-2 ground-state inelastic collisions between 300 and 20 K are presented in machine-readable format. Other (incomplete) sets of theoretical rates from the literature are discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available