4.4 Article

High-Intensity Events in International Women's Team Handball Matches

Journal

Publisher

HUMAN KINETICS PUBL INC
DOI: 10.1123/ijspp.2015-0641

Keywords

accelerometry; inertial movement units; team sport; physical demands

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose: International women's team handball is a physically demanding sport and is intermittent in nature. The aim of the study was to profile high-intensity events (HIEs) in international women's team handball matches with regard to playing positions. Methods: Twenty female national-team handball players were equipped with inertial movement units (OptimEye S5, Catapult Sports, Australia) in 9 official international matches. Players were categorized in 4 different playing positions: backs, wings, pivots, and goalkeepers (GKs). PlayerLoad(TM), accelerations (Acc), changes of direction (CoD), decelerations (Dec), and the sum of the latter 3, HIEs, were extracted from raw-data files using the manufacturer's software. All Acc, Dec, CoD, and HIEs >2.5 m/s were included. Data were log-transformed and differences were standardized for interpretation of magnitudes and reported with effect-size statistics. Results: Mean numbers of events were 0.7 +/- 0.4 Acc/min, 2.3 +/- 0.9 Dec/min, and 1.0 +/- 0.4 CoD/min. Substantial differences between playing positions, ranging from small to very large, were found in the 3 parameters. Backs showed a most likely greater frequency for HIE/min (5.0 +/- 1.1 HIE/min) than all other playing positions. Differences between playing positions were also apparent in PlayerLoad/min. Conclusion: HIEs in international women's team handball are position specific, and the overall intensity depends on the positional role within a team. Specific HIE and intensity profiles from match play provide useful information for a better understanding of the overall game demands and for each playing position.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available