4.6 Article

Theoretical free energy profile and benchmarking of functionals for amino-thiourea organocatalyzed nitro-Michael addition reaction

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 20, Pages 11529-11536

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/d0cp00481b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. CNPq
  2. FAPEMIG
  3. CAPES

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Amino-thiourea organocatalysis is an important catalytic process for enantioselective conjugate addition reactions. The interaction of the reactants with the catalyst has a substantial effect of dispersion forces and is a challenge for a reliable description when applying density functional theory. In this report, the classical addition of acetylacetone to beta-nitro-styrene catalyzed by Takemoto's catalyst in toluene was studied using the PBE functional for geometry optimization and the DLPNO-CCSD(T) benchmark method for single point energy. The complete free energy profile calculated for the reaction was able to explain all experimental observations, including the fact that the carbon-carbon bond formation step is rate-determining. The overall barrier was calculated to be 22.8 kcal mol(-1) (experimental value approximately 20 kcal mol(-1)), and the enantiomeric excess was calculated to be 88% (experimental value in the range of 84 to 92%). Some functionals were tested for single point energy. The hybrid B3LYP presented a high mean absolute deviation (MAD) from the DLPNO-CCSD(T) benchmark method by approximately 20 kcal mol(-1). The inclusion of empirical dispersion correction in the B3LYP method decreased the MAD to 6 kcal mol(-1). Even the double-hybrid mPW2-PLYP and B2GP-PLYP methods had MAD values of approximately 5 kcal mol(-1). The inclusion of the dispersion correction decreased the MAD to 3.6 kcal mol(-1). M06-2X and omega B97X-D3 were the most accurate among the tested functionals, with MADs of 2.5 kcal mol(-1) and 1.8 kcal mol(-1), respectively. Additivity approximation of the correlation energy was also tested and presented a MAD of only 0.6 kcal mol(-1).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available